Defining and Achieving Success

There is no honor in redefining success by lowering criteria to meet the current circumstance.

Success is a set of criteria that must be defined by an individual and is based on their Values and Philosophy. Success can be thought of simply as living in line with such Values and Philosophy. It must be defined with unmoving criteria if one wants to truly be successful. It cannot be defined on a moving scale. The criteria must be unchanging and the individual must rise to the level of achievement they seek. To move the scale of success is to cheapen the actual success one may achieve.

Success requires a great deal of discipline and strength to achieve. As one gets increasingly ambitious with their goals, their character must rise to match the challenges they face. There will be obstacles to overcome and many chances to quit along the path. The Initiated see these obstacles and run right at them with the intention of overcoming them. The drive to achieve based on Philosophy comes from deep within the Initiated. To the Initiated, to fail a pursuit is to betray their character – it is a significant occurrence. 

When an individual decides to define success for themselves they reject the ideals of the masses and give themselves the opportunity to succeed and stand out from the herd. There are some things that the Initiated must look out for, though. These are the tactics exploited by the masses in their effort to make achievement accessible to many and effectively diminish such achievement. These must be known to the Initiated when they decide they no longer want to subscribe to the ideas spread by society to stay true to their path. 

Early Exits

As mentioned, along the journey there will be opportunity to take an exit off of the path to a place of diminished success. These exits are named things like “good enough”, “close enough”, or “sufficient”. All of these terms mean that you have not reached the intended end but instead have just moved the end of the journey up to where one may currently be. This is the application of the sliding scale discussed above. These are the verbal equivalents of participation trophies – one did not win, but should feel some cheapened form of accomplishment for what they have been able to do. 

Another instance of early exits are found in revisiting the original intent of the journey. Said differently, going back to make sure one “understood” what the original goal of the pursuit was. Understood is in quotations here because the goal of such a practice is often not to gain better understanding but rather to redefine what the criteria for success was; in a situation where the goal proves to be more difficult to achieve than anticipated, the goal is redefined to something more attainable from where one currently sits. 

Society uses these tactics to diminish the meaning of achievement or to make success more accessible to the masses. When the standards prove to be too rigorous and when too many people complain of challenge, society responds with lessened requirements. Those that disagree with the new rules are attacked until the new, lower standards achieve mass adoption. 

This practice is a disservice to everyone who participates. The ability to change the rules of the game after the game starts only serves to make winning the game easier and brings the performance of the whole population down along with the game’s integrity. No longer are people challenged to rise to the occasion. Instead, the world makes it possible for the criteria to come lower to meet those people unfit to elevate themselves to such heights.

Recognizing and Accepting Failures

The easy interpretation of pitting success against failure is to say that without one, one cannot appreciate the other. Without knowledge and understanding of failure, one cannot appreciate success. This is too surface-level to be significant. One’s ability to recognize and accept their failures is paramount in maintaining the integrity of their successes. 

Those with a fragile ego will be unable to admit to their failures. When one is unable to recognize and own failures, they will need to spin their failures into success, or worse, defend themselves by pinning failures on circumstances or factors “out of their control”. Neither practice supports meaningful success. Instead, these practices breed weakness and diminish the success that may have happened by not allowing the true successes to stand on their own having to share the spotlight with the failures that are spun into successes. This is done in an effort to protect the ego of the individuals involved.

Society has created an attitude where everyone’s a winner. Society’s inability to address and define “losers” has cheapened the accomplishment of succeeding within the system. Those participants of the masses that are unable to look within for an answer to why they are unsuccessful are seen launching outward attacks citing things such as inequality of opportunity, favoritism, or any other excuse that deflects responsibility from themselves to the system as a whole. 

The acceptance in response to such attacks – the willingness to provide credibility to such assertions gives these people just the validation they need to continue thinking this way. The validation provides the justification needed to reinforce the narrative that the game is rigged against them and they will never succeed regardless of their efforts. This is a cancer that is taking hold of everyone with this mindset rotting the population from the inside out. 

The truth is that this mindset and perspective is just the thing that is diminishing these people’s chances at succeeding. Rather than shine a light on this fact, the masses continue to allow such a victimized perspective to continue and further go to foster these ideas with campaigns to “close the gap”.

Wrap Up

Success is achieved when one looks within for the answers to the question “how do I succeed”. By looking within one is going to find the methods and strategies needed to elevate themselves to a level of success rather than attempting to find all of the ways in which they can lower the requirements of success to come closer to them. This should be the goal of anyone setting out on the path to be successful and to get more than they currently have. They must find the ways that they must grow in order to get to where they want to go.

Society’s willingness and ability to continually lower expectations of people is hurting the population. Call it tough-love if preferred, but it is our obligation to keep the entry to success high and challenge others to reach that elevated level. This is how the Initiated grow and how everyone else should be challenged to do the same.

The Initiated must live in this world amongst these people that choose to look externally for the answers, but they do not need to engage with this outlook. Amongst all of the noise, the Initiated work to develop themselves in line with their own Values and Philosophy. The Initiated live to their own set of standards and will outperform the masses worrying about how badly they are being screwed by the world. 

Define success then put a plan together to achieve. Do not stop until you reach the promised land.

Yours in strength,


Sign up for direct Transmissions sent out to the Initiated population every Thursday. Direct Transmissions tailored to the Initiated dive deeper into topics, thoughts, and application of the Tenets and Initiated Philosophy.

Success! You're on the list.

Leaders Leading Leaders

A team of leaders will outperform a team of followers.

Conventional wisdom may say that a leader needs followers. There are numerous sayings warning of the dangers of having too many leaders on a team, such as “too many chiefs, not enough Indians”. Perceptions may be that there should be less leaders and more followers so that a leader can do their job without conflict and that there are people available to carry out the work. 

Could a team made up entirely of leaders succeed? Is it possible to not have enough leaders? Let’s say that the most successful teams are built entirely of leaders. Does that make sense?

I say it does – a team made up of leaders will outperform a team of followers.

A fact is that a leader that seeks followers may not be a great leader themself for it is far easier to lead followers than it is to lead other leaders. “Easier” in these terms is in relation to the skill level required by a leader. To lead followers, one must develop trust and build a position of higher status to be seen as a leader. To lead leaders; however, one must also do these things but further develop the skills required to listen to and accept conflicting ideas or criticisms. Leaders should actively seek this feedback from their team as such feedback will help to elevate the team’s performance. 

The skills and perspectives of leaders are simply different from those of followers. Much of the friction that can come into a leader/follower dynamic can be attributed to this fundamental miss in understanding.

Below I will make the case that a team of leaders will far exceed the performance of a team of followers through looking at three key characteristics that differ between leaders from followers:


The most significant key characteristic of a leader is their understanding and application of ownership in both their perspective and acceptance of responsibility. Ownership means that anything and everything that falls under one’s given responsibilities as well as anything that comes in close proximity to those responsibilities is the leader’s to address. Whether they are the best equipped to handle a specific incident, whether they are trained or qualified, whether they are able to delegate the task to someone else, a leader will take ownership of the situation and see to it’s resolution. There are no hard limits to a leader’s responsibilities and they understand that as a leader, they are responsible for the success of the team rather than the success of only their assignment. 

This shift from self-performance to team-performance is founded in a leader’s ability to understand and buy into the team’s mission. A leader understands the importance of supporting the team’s mission and they will understand that this may require one to step outside of their comfort zones or to overstep a perceived boundary if they see an opportunity to address an issue that will ultimately impact the team. 

Ownership of one’s part within the team and within the mission takes on a different meaning when talking to a leader. A leader’s role in the team becomes less about specific responsibilities and more about success of a discipline. This shift in perspective invests an individual to mission success rather than task success. This change in perspective is difficult to foster with followers. While followers may be able to accept responsibility and also understand the team’s objective, followers have a difficult time stepping outside of the lines and stepping into different roles without being directed to do so. Followers lack the perspective to see how the dynamic of the team and of a situation shifts and ultimately the impacts that this shifting will have on the team’s success. 

This lack of perspective stems from the fact that a follower is not tasked to develop such perspective. As a follower, reliance is placed upon the leader of the group to provide direction. It must be understood that leaders are not perfect and cannot be vigilant and aware of all outside threats. Leaders rely on their team to keep their eyes open and scan the surroundings for such opportunities to head off issues before they turn into larger problems. Followers are less equipped to do this than leaders are.

It is in the interest of a leader and of the larger team that leaders are developed throughout the ranks to take advantage of the strength of ownership. 

Critical Thinking

Leaders are required to think critically to perform their jobs and to be effective. Leaders develop the skill to take in a lot of information, process and analyze, and synthesize a response or plan that will progress the team’s objective further. This all requires critical thinking – a “trust but verify” approach. 

A leader’s perspective to external stimuli is approached from the perspective of “does this make sense?” and “how does this align with the team’s goals?”. These questions will direct a leader’s next move and their response to the information. Leaders question frequently to ensure understanding of the situation and the information. This leads back to ownership; a leader feels the responsibility to make the correct decision not for only themself, but for the team’s objective and mission. 

An effective leader will be influenced less than a follower. Whereas a leader will question to ensure understanding, a follower’s mentality is more vulnerable to external influence and may allow such an individual to stray from the team’s objectives if they perceive they are being instructed by a perceived authority figure. It is in a follower’s nature to follow. 

As a leader, one must rely on their team members to execute on the team’s mission. This execution requires that the team members have the ability to stand up to adversity and make decisions that may be unpopular, but necessary to push the team forward. 

Decentralized Command

A team large enough will be unable to be managed effectively by a single leader. This is why militaries, corporations, and companies all make use of a hierarchy in their leadership structure. As explained here, the hierarchy of leadership allows each level within the hierarchy to focus on specific tasks that they are best equipped to handle in both skill and perspective. 

A hierarchy of this kind requires decentralized command (all credit for this term to Jocko) to make the most effective use of people and resources. Decentralized command is the idea that leadership is found and practiced at all levels of the organization. With a strong fundamental understanding of the organization’s procedures and mission goals, leaders at all levels have the latitude to make decisions that will allow them to carry out their part in supporting the larger objective. These decisions are the tactics that each leader at each level will use to effectively execute their own specific objectives.

This idea of decentralized command flows down to the lowest members on the totem pole. A team built of leaders will train their people and allow even the newest member of a team to make the decisions required to fulfill their role. 

When a team of leaders make use of decentralized command in this way, the team benefits from the unique perspectives and skills of the team members at all levels. This is the effective use of diversity that companies today attempt to foster. Decentralized command – empowering all members of the team to make decisions in support of the team’s objectives – is the most direct way to capitalize on the diversity of the team’s skills, backgrounds, and experiences. 

Wrap Up

The picture that many have of having “too many leaders”; the internal disagreement and differences of opinion that plague opposing leadership, is a reality only when dealing with underdeveloped leaders. Strong leaders that understand the team’s objectives understand that the benefit and success of the team is more important than being right. 

Leaders that understand their role in supporting the team’s vision can assume the roles required by the team and do their part in leading what is within their realm to accomplish with the methods and practices they see fit.

This speaks to the importance of the skill and strength of the most senior member of leadership in developing and clearly communicating the team’s objectives to the rest of the team allowing and empowering all members of the team to lead. 

Strong leaders build and lead leaders. Those leaders that seek followers are missing the point.

Yours in strength,


Sign up for direct Transmissions sent out to the Initiated population every Thursday. Direct Transmissions tailored to the Initiated dive deeper into topics, thoughts, and application of the Tenets and Initiated Philosophy.

Success! You're on the list.

Loneliness and Leadership

There will be times of loneliness when pursuing your own path. Such loneliness must be embraced, not feared.

Leadership requires sacrifice. To be a leader one must be prepared and willing to make tough decisions regardless of the popularity of such decisions. It requires one to have unwavering conviction to a set of values and ideals. It requires belief in a vision and the ability to visualize an end goal that may be unrecognizable to others. A leader must embrace the need to stand out in front of others and go against the status quo if they have any aspiration of executing on their vision. 

In the context of this Transmission, a leader is defined as the opposite of a follower. It is not used here to describe a leader of a team, though many of the same ideas discussed in this Transmission apply to team leadership as well. A leader as used here is one who breaks away from the masses rather than blindly following the herd; one who thinks critically and relates all external information back to one’s own Philosophy.

Leadership is a mindset in which all decisions are made based on a set of held values and does not consider the popularity of such decisions. A leader’s decisions and pursuits are driven by something deeper than preference – they are driven by the leader’s beliefs and vision. The success of a leader is not only defined by the number of people they are able to influence but also by their ability to face great adversity and remain true to their values and vision. A leader does not need the support of others along their path if they believe strongly in their mission. 

It can be anticipated that leadership can easily present one with situations where they are put into the position of the lone wolf – the single entity that must stand alone and go their own way. It is important that a leader is able to embrace this position of the lone wolf as it may be a required stage of the process of building their vision. 

A leader must not be afraid of being the lone wolf, but must not strive to be one, either. The lone wolf phase should only last as long as it takes to:

  1. Understand the vision and values that drove one to break away from the herd in the first place. This cements the vision and puts a strategy in place. 
  2. Develop the vision to a point where it is impervious to eternal influence.
  3. Build within oneself the values that they wish to find in others that align with their vision.

The position of the lone wolf is vulnerable. Without the support and protection of a pack, the lone wolf is exposed to attack. Even if the lone wolf is able to fend off attacks for a long while, eventually, the wolf will tire and be overcome by their attackers. With that said, the lone wolf phase of any change is simply something that must be endured and work through. Again, a leader operates from a place deeper than convenience or ease. The deep drive to enact change will push a leader into this uncomfortable and vulnerable position with the promise of coming out the other side better and more in alignment with their values. 

In this sense, community is not a requirement for a leader to be successful, but the available strength and benefit of a supportive community cannot be overstated. It is critical; however, that the leader searches for a community only after first understanding their vision and values. In this way, such a leader can be sure that the community they find will align with their vision and be that strength and support that will strengthen their cause rather than detract from it. 

Feelings of loneliness during the transition into becoming a self-leader or even a leader beginning a new pursuit is a reality of the situation. One’s vision lives within themselves and for them to change their life to be more in alignment with that vision will require one take it upon themselves to enact the required changes. The support of others may or may not be there in the beginning, but through unrelenting pursuit of the vision, one will be able to find others that will provide the support and strength that they need to carry them forward when their own strength is vulnerable. 

This loneliness must not be feared – it should instead be seen as an opportunity and personal challenge through which one strengthens their resolve and confidence to push forward in their pursuits. 

Stay focused and stay the path. You’re making progress.

Yours in strength,


Sign up for direct Transmissions sent out to the Initiated population every Thursday. Direct Transmissions tailored to the Initiated dive deeper into topics, thoughts, and application of the Tenets and Initiated Philosophy.

Success! You're on the list.

What is Leadership to a Team

Not all bosses are leaders and not all leaders are bosses.

Leadership is not found in a title – it is found in those who lead. It is the actions, ideas, and practices forged through experience. It is something that is recognized when it is seen and felt by those being led. 

Leadership involves more than being the head of a team. While leadership typically comes with elevated authority, successful leaders need not lean on that authority to lead their team. Leaders lean on the respect and trust between themselves and their team to lead their team to success. 

It takes many strong qualities to lead and to be seen and respected as a leader. It requires a level of self development and understanding that some are not willing to work to. 

So, what is leadership to a team?

Being a leader is a position of strength. It is admirable, it is respected, and it is a position of high responsibility and high reward when done effectively. Leadership is where the Tenets come to life in a setting outside of oneself. Leadership is far from easy and is a test of one’s mettle. It has the potential to test a person in many ways as the challenges of the mission often do not reveal themselves until they are unearthed. Even the best strategies must leave enough lateral movement for tactics to address issues as they come up.

Leadership of a team pulls from each of the Tenets to frame what it takes to be a competent and respected leader.


Leaders are strong individuals – both mentally and physically. A leader’s strength is something that is felt rather than explained – a leader’s team knows when they are in the presence of true strength.

Physical strength may not be required to carry out the tasks of a leader today; however, physical strength still remains a core characteristic of a competent leader. While a leader’s physical abilities may not help them to perform direct job duties, there is a lot that is understood about oneself mentally and emotionally that can only come through training one’s body. Through strength training, one forges new connections and understandings with their body, their confidence and sureness of self increases, and they have a different understanding of discipline and integrity that those who do not train their bodies will not understand.

Further, the physical strength is a metaphor for what it meant to be a leader in a more primal time. A leader’s responsibility was to protect their tribe from the outside – to protect their “us” from “them”. In an unrefined time violence was common and a leader must have been prepared to fight for what was theirs. This primal response is still alive and well today even if we do not acknowledge it outright – people are more apt to respect the person with a strong, fit physique than not. 

A physically weak leader may often be seen as equally mentally weak.

Mental strength and endurance is the other side of strength that a leader must embody. Not only does it take mental fortitude to make decisions and attack problems, they must accept the responsibilities of performing such job duties with grace and ease. The apparent ease with which one is able to accept the rigors of leadership will determine the confidence that one’s team has in the abilities of their leader. This directly feeds into the loyalty and support that that leader will have from their team and the mutual trust between team and leader that is necessary to a team’s success.

A leader must carry intensity with them into battle for the team will feed from their energy. Intensity is found under a heavy barbell and in study of strong leaders that have come before. It is through training the body and mind that one’s confidence is strengthened and turned into the hunger to succeed. 

The conviction that a leader brings to their role of enacting strategy is founded in the strength and belief in the systems that they put together. Weakness seen in a leader will create unease in the ranks.


The most effective leaders rely on discipline amongst the ranks to perform job duties in alignment with the mission requirements. It is through discipline that the lower ranks of the team perform as is expected by the team leadership.

Low discipline teams will not be bought into the larger mission and will rely on motivation to complete project tasks. It is this reliance on motivation that will produce inconsistent and unreliable work products, which will make it difficult for the leader to monitor progress or keep confidence in the performance of the team. A leader that fails to create a disciplined environment makes the team’s performance suffer as well as their job harder.

In order to create such an environment of discipline the leader must embody the discipline that they expect of their followers. Without the ability to lead by example, a leader will have little chance of effectively creating such an environment.

The leader’s role is to push their team to perform efficiently. A leader must do this through setting deadlines for both themselves and their team and requiring that all parties, including themself, meet the deadlines set. Requiring the team to deliver on their commitments is the bedrock from which the team’s discipline will be built upon. Without this easy foundation of trust and discipline, the team will have little chance of being disciplined elsewhere.


An effective leader builds teams up with Integrity – completeness and unity of all resources to maximize the efficiency of efforts of the team. It is the completeness and unification of resources that foster synergy amongst the team.

The attitude of teamwork is affected directly by a leader’s ability to integrate all parts and pieces of a team into the end goal. A leader must lead with the understanding that they are part of the team. A leader is not a boss and is not above the culture and values of the team as a whole. Any leader that puts themselves above the team loses their place as a leader and instead becomes a dictator or boss. 

Unity across all of the ranks will create strength that is stronger than the sum of the parts. 

A leader must understand that they are no longer only responsible for their own scope – all of the scope of their team is now their responsibility. The entire team’s performance is a reflection on the abilities of the leader. A strong leader will get more production and better product out of a team than that same team will produce under a less competent leader.

Creating a highly disciplined team makes large strides toward that team being built with Integrity. Through discipline all parts of the team will perform their tasks that support the other branches of the team. The ability of one side of the team to rely on the other side of the team creates unity among the ranks.

Wrap Up

The Initiated Philosophy and Initiated Lifestyle is built on the foundation of only four Tenets – Strength, Discipline, Integrity, and Leadership as these four concepts are all that are needed to build an Initiated life.

I used this Transmission to show how Leadership is supported by the other three Tenets in an effort to not only provide insight into why Leadership is important, but to show the Integrity and synergy that is possible through the study of the depth of these four Tenets. 

Leadership may be where the Tenets are brought out to others, but it is also how one approaches themself

The Initiated are leaders in all senses of the word. They can lead teams as well as be their own leaders of their lives. 

Forge Strength, Discipline, and Integrity – go forth and lead.

Yours in strength


Sign up for direct Transmissions sent out to the Initiated population every Thursday. Direct Transmissions tailored to the Initiated dive deeper into topics, thoughts, and application of the Tenets and Initiated Philosophy.

Success! You're on the list.

Lead Oneself Before Leading Others

A leader must first learn to lead themselves before stepping into a leadership role over others.

A leader has no business attempting to lead others until they have learned to lead themselves. One who is unable to stand on their own two feet and face adversity alone is unfit to assume the role and responsibilities placed upon a leader. The grit and determination required to get out from under the thumb of another and on one’s own must first be forged before setting sights toward a position of leadership over others. 

Many do not realize how manipulated by society they are and how deep external pressures have sunk their claws into their soft flesh. One cannot be considered a leader if they are well within the grasp of someone or something else – such a person does not have the outlook required to do what is right and required in consideration of the situation at hand.

A leader must be freestanding and ready to accept the challenges that lie ahead. They must exhibit the strength to stand on one’s own beliefs of right and wrong. Conviction and belief in the plan is a must. A leader must earn the respect and trust of their team and, once earned, protect that respect and trust. This is accomplished through being the example of what others in the team are expected to be.

The bulk of this Transmission will come down to the fact that to be considered a leader, one must lead by example. To be the example one must embody the characteristics that they expect their team to display.

Do What Is Right

What is “right” in the sense of leading oneself? What are the rules that will determine the rightness of one’s actions?

One’s philosophy is the set of guiding principles that one acts in accordance with in order to be “right”. The Philosophy, as the guiding words, will inform what principles one shall act in line with. 

“Right” is relative to each individual just as one’s Philosophy is unique to one’s own values and goals. When one makes the investment to live to their own code, rightness or wrongness as projected by others does not matter. 

Right and wrong is subjective when put out to the masses – what is right and just to one may be wholly wrong to another. It is not a leader’s job to pass judgement upon the ideals of others, their job is to execute the code or strategy to which they have constructed. 

To do what is right takes discipline, confidence, and strength, which are all requirements of a good leader. It is not enough to do what is mostly right or sometimes right. If one wants to be an effective leader, one must buy into doing what is right all of the time regardless of circumstance or challenges associated with the action. 

Do It Consistently

Discipline and Integrity are qualities that any good leader will expect of their team and so they must first be understood and built within oneself in order to bring that with them to the team environment. A leader does not act based on motivation; instead, they act in accordance with their code.

A strong code and belief in that code will drive one to act with more intensity than motivation could hope to muster. A code should serve to be a burning fire that drives intense action toward reaching enlightenment where enlightenment is the realization of one’s Philosophy and values. 

Consistency, therefore, does not come from what one “should” do, it comes from what one must do to live in line with their values. There are few things in this world that are non-negotiable and mission success and one’s values must be of this category. A leader must approach a mission with an attitude that mission success is non-negotiable. The tenacity required to adopt this approach is a tenacity that only comes from one who declares that failure is not an option. A leader must first learn this for themself and then inspire a team to feel the same.

Develop Lacking Skills

A leader must be in control of themselves – emotional intelligence and ego must be developed to a level at which neither will impact one’s ability to lead. 

The inability to control emotions makes a leader unreliable and reactive. Emotion does not appeal to logic and emotional decisions are rarely sound. If a leader cannot segregate emotion from the task at hand, they will be putting their future team at risk of the fallout of poor decisions. Inefficiencies and doubt will run rampant through the ranks under a leader that reacts with emotion rather than acts with intention. A leader must be able to remain sound of mind when facing opposition.

The inability to control ego will make a leader untrusted as their motives for taking specific actions may be suspect. A leader with too large a sense of self-importance will appear to be out for their own interests over the benefit of the team. Their communication with their team will be poor as one’s ego will not allow for them to accept criticisms of their work. An ego is a dangerous liability in a leadership position as it will act similar to emotion in that logic does not stand. Logic will take a back seat to the actions that will serve to protect or build a leader’s ego. Rather than the interests and successes of the team taking top priority, a leader with a hungry ego will put their ego first to be sure that it is fed the buffet of validation that it desires. 

Do It For Some Time

Experience is the greatest teacher because the stakes are real. When one is facing a challenge head-on, it is a decision to take action or fail. These same stakes do not exist when reading a book – if a theory or idea is not understood, one can go back and re-read the section to try again. In the field, facing the challenge head on, one must rely on whatever skills and knowledge one has gained to that point and get creative in filling gaps. 

The best and most useful knowledge is gained through such experience. Experience cannot be gained from the pages of a book but must be collected through repetitive trials. 

A leadership position will generally come with some level of accepted experience and it is for exactly this reason. A principle or idea is not learned until one is able to put it to use in a real world situation. What looks to be a great plan on paper can quickly fall apart in practice as there are challenges and environments in the real world that are not accurately captured in the pages of a book. 

It is these unexpected obstacles that test a leader’s resourcefulness and sticktoitiveness. A leader must learn to see adversity as opportunity and forge the ability to remain present and make sound decisions when the original plan does not go as scripted. This is first done when a leader is striving for their own goals – it is here that tactics are learned that can later be transferred to a team setting where there are more moving parts to consider.

Leadership is serious business. As a leader, one represents their team. The leader becomes the figurehead of those that are under them. A poor leader will not develop their people, will not represent them in the proper way, and will not keep their best interests at the heart of decisions. The team relies on the leader and to assume a leadership position must be approached with the care and gravity that it warrants. 


A leader is not a boss or a manager – these are positions granted by title. Leadership is not a title but rather found in the makeup of a person. It is found in a compilation of specific skills and knowledge that allow one to be seen as the person best fit to lead a team to success and victory. 

Leadership is not an idea that should be approached lightly. Leaders are called upon to lead by example. A leader shall be prepared to assume whatever role the situation requires – there is no task that is below a leader as a leader is only concerned with mission success. The ability and willingness to perform any job within the team builds the camaraderie and trust required to foster strong team ties and the trust needed between leader and team. 

Again, one has no business leading others until they are equipped and able to lead themselves. To allow one who does not know the meaning of leadership to be put into a leadership role is irresponsible to the team and further setting that “leader” up for failure. 

Leadership is an Initiated Tenet for a reason – leaders embody the characteristics that the Initiated train for. It is the culmination of one’s study and training and will pull from all of the buckets that one has acquired and built over years of work. 

Lead yourself. Lead your life. Then lead others.

Yours in strength,


Join our mailing list below for more Transmissions that only get sent to the Initiated mailing list – those not subscribed will miss out on more in-depth looks at the Tenets, their application, and their power.

Success! You're on the list.